The Drug War & Drug Money

Police, decide and other officials would non be vulnerable to depravity because corruption is rooted in the irregularity of medicates and the attendant high cost of those medicines. Regulating do drugs exertion and sales would give the government control of the situation, would instantly debase prices to a level with which criminal drug-makers could non and would not compete, and corruption of officials would be over. This is an even more compelling argument when we use up the negative impact the corruption of public officials has on the province in moral terms, especially on the youth of the nation. either time a TV news program or newspaper article reports police corruption, it cannot result in anything plainly a further breakdown in the moral fond organization of the individual and of the fraternity as a whole. After all, if cops and judges be corrupt, why should the average citizen behave morally, especially with delight in to using il sanctioned drugs? In addition, in moral terms, the citizen who is other than law-abiding, suddenly sees himself as a lawbreaker if he uses illegal drugs. This further alienates him from the society which makes such laws which he feels are not germane(predicate) to him.

Carter writes that the illegality of drugs creates an incentive for individual Americans to participate in the drug trade because of the money involved:

The money that can be made from an illegal product that has about 23 one thousand million current users in this cou

This leaves the drug cocaine, which is generally seen today as the most troublesome drug with wonder to law enforcement, treatment, and legalization:

This horrible set of percentage is not suddenly going to get better on its own, and the current polity has been shown to be impotent at best, and at worst it has an aggravating effect on the situation, driving more youngsters into a life of offense associated with drug use, sales, and related crime and violence. The war on drugs has been lost. It is time for a brand-new policy based on legalization. It is difficult to se how, overall, the problems associated with drugs would worsen by such a brave change in social and legal policy.

Carter admits that he does not have all the answers with respect to crack cocaine, and adds that "addiction levels might increase, at least temporarily, if legal sanctions were removed" (11).

Carter concludes with the argument that the situation existing in this society as long as prohibition of drugs continues will altogether grow worse:

This question is especially vital and relevant in an increasingly conservative era in which both penny and dollar of public monies is analyzes as to its allocation and military posture in public programs. Conservatives are inconsistent in the run afoul between their moral and practical stands on this issue. The costs of change magnitude law enforcement with respect to illegal drugs are prohibitive, and the practicality of such a policy is non-existent.

Carter addresses the alternative to legalization: an increase in efforts to soften rugs through the courts and jails:

Another effective argument from Carter for the legalization of drugs focuses on the relative revile done by such drugs compared to the damage done by the legal drugs of alcohol and tobacco:

Since the courts and jails are already swamped beyond capacity by the arrests that are routinely made (44,000 drug dealers and users over a two-year spot in Washington alone), and since those
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.