Good vs. Bad Julius Ceasar

In the time of the ruling of Julius Caesar, all told of the Romans loved most of Caesars qualities. He was a trustworthy and popular leader and did a lot for the people. But most Romans had a problem with Caesar and political program to belt d aver him. These people were Brutus and Cassius. This started a civil contend amid the Romans. This war may contain been prevented if Brutus and Cassius had do things a humble differently. Cassius would develop made a dumbfound around leader or else than Brutus. Cassius to a fault had more of a hotness to kill Caesar. Brutus did non vex the morals of a slayer give care Caesar did.         As far as force strategy goes Cassius had the better wit for it. Brutus was not a precise good military strategist. Cassius knew that it would be a good creative thinker to kill Antony. He spot that Antony would talk the people into nerve-wracking to kill Brutus and Cassius even though their intentions were good. But Brutus did not fate to make it go come on the likes of a livestock bath. overly at Caesars funeral, he trusted Antony to say wholly good things about Brutus and Cassius and not that they are murderers. When Cassius said that they should kill Antony too, Brutus said he did not want to make it look like a descent bath. He was vengeful and explosive.

He argued with Brutus about lying, to the point where they endanger each others lives. Cassius said they should not march to battle of battle of Philippi because it would cloy the troops out and they would not have the reward of cosmos in their own territory. On the other hand, Brutus apprehension that if they marched to Philippi they would catch Antonys troops off guard. alternatively of doing what Brutus said, they should have listened to Cassius.         Although they... If you want to get a full essay, bless it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.