The federal government aims 77 major means-tested programs at the unworthy, and hundreds more outlive at the state and local level.
Yet over the same(p) 30-year period, the national nuisance rate has doubled.
Crime began to rise in the mid-1960s, and peaked in 1974 with 10.2 homicides per 100,000?comp bed to 4.7 in 1961.
In 1993, the homicide rate was 10 per 100,000.
Crimes against property have grown 259 percent over the ultimo 30 years, but violent offensive activitys have increased 560 percent.
The sad atomic number 18 both to three times more belike to be victims of violent crimes than those above the poverty level.
There are galore(postnominal) theorists who take an opposing viewpoint to the above scenario. Instead, they conceptualize that economically depressed areas are breeding grounds for crime because of a variety of factors. They claim that economically depressed neighborhoods have a few(prenominal) investors willing to invest first in a crime-ridden, low-income family neighborhood. Further, many juveniles and teenagers have only criminals as their role models, from poesy runners to drug dealers. Finally, these juveniles and teenagers are typically undereducated and have few marketable skills because of living in such an economically disadvantaged environm
The real crime, according to many theorists, is poverty itself. Poverty creates stressors in the daily lives of the poor that trade name them more prone to crime and violent behaviors. Further, poverty intimately often hits minority families and neighborhoods, neighborhoods which cannot offer protection, decent jobs, or a good education to their inhabitants. In many minority and medium-large urban neighborhoods the situation is dire for the potential success of residents, " well three out of four Latino clawren and almost 60 percent of Black children are born into poverty?figures that are up by 19 percent since 1990. 8,000 children in smart York City are homeless, a figure up close 21%.
Nearly half of all public train children read below grade level and are likely to drop out of school before earning a extravagantly school diploma" (Sad State 20).
Many politicians and those opposed to back up for the poor argue that most criminals commit crime because they prefer to, and they maintain a perception of poor people as uneducated, lazy, and somehow morally or socially inferior to those with money. However, as the above statistic demonstrate, merely sterilizeting a job and running(a) hard in this country is not enough to deliver one from the brutal ravages of poverty. A study conducted in Wisconsin build that minority groups are hit most hard by the effects of poverty and that the crime rates in poor neighborhoods have been on the rise over the past two decades, but social workers in that state argue that back up someone acquire a job that keeps them in a perpetual state of tension trying to meet the elementary needs of their families and themselves and is solution to reducing poverty or crime rates, "I have no quarrel with doing everything we can to get people to work. It's an admirable goal. It's part of America. But when we do that, we ought to turn in everything we can to support that person in the workplace: child care, health care and enough reward for working to survive. The divulge factor behind
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment